The URJ and RJC

Yesterday, the New York Times ran a full page add by the Republican Jewish Committee stating that the Union for Reform Judaism does not speak for them regarding the War in Iraq. This is fine, the two organizations are independent bodies and therefore do not have to agree. However, the add is misleading to the point of absurdity. It states in large type "Freedom is Worth Fighting For" which the URJ absolutely agrees to. The URJ's resolution focused on encouraging a clear exit strategy in a way that maintains and strengthens the peace and stability in the region. Furthermore, it makes it seem like no Jew opposes the war, which is false. (In poles, about 2/3 of American Jews oppose the war.) The add also states "We support our troops," insinuating that the Union does not. However, the resolution passed explicitly mentions that the Union supports the troops and funding should be used to provide troops with the maximum security possible. The add also states that the RJC supports the War on Terrorism. The War in Iraq as part of the War on Terror is based on false information at best, and manipulation at worst. In fact, the URJ supported the invasion of Afghanistan as a response to September 11th. Furthermore, resolutions passed by a specific body do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all of its members, let alone non-members. This is commonly understood. Take as an example bills that congress passes.